← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
VanagonEuroVan
Sort by authorSort by posting dateSort by topicChronological orderMost recent firstShow authorHide authorShow table of contentsHide table of contentsBack to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGONSearch
Subject:Re: Interesting Tire Comparison
From:Stephen Edwards <welfarewrkr@IGC.ORG>
Date:Thu, 23 Jul 2009 20:58:05 -0500

Cheers Ron!

The Hankook RA08's in 195R14 that I bought from you more than 4 years
and 40 to 50,000 miles ago are still running fine.
They aren't snow tires, but then they weren't expected to be, and for
everything else - including ride and handling - they're great.

Steve Edwards, Chicago - 91 GL daily driver with Subaru 2.2 in the
trunk.

On Jul 23, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Automatic digest processor wrote:

> Date:    Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:16:49 -0400
> From:    The Bus Depot <vanagon@BUSDEPOT.COM>
> Subject: Interesting Tire Comparison
>
> The latest Car And Driver Magazine did a head-to-head of 10
> comparably rated
> tires from competing manufacturers. One of their goals was to find
> out if an
> off-brand tire with the same tread pattern and sidewall specs
> (traction,
> load capacity, speed rating, etc.) as a name brand tire would actually
> perform as well (or at least close).
>
> In the end they rated a Dunlop tire #1, closely followed by a
> Hankook that
> was half its price and the cheapest of them all (besides the off-brand
> tire). As for the comparably-spec'd Chinese off-brand tire?  It
> scored so
> poorly that "we had to round up its score to zero to keep it from
> being
> negative" and could not recommend it even at the $57 "bargain"
> price. Even
> the second worst tire in the ratings almost tripled its score.  (As an
> interesting aside, the Kumho tire was highly rated on dry roads,
> but was
> undone by wet-road handling that was "nothing short of diabolical.")
>
> How does this relate to Vanagon tires?  Of course the results
> cannot be
> applied directly, as these high performance tires are not Vanagon
> tires. But
> it clearly illustrates that you cannot go by sidewall specs (such
> as load
> capacity) alone. Those specs are important in order to rule out
> tires that
> are simply underrated for the vehicle and must be dismissed out of
> hand ...
> but the remaining tires can still vary from "excellent" to
> "diabolical."  In
> Vanagon speak, this means that a cheap tire with a C or D load
> rating may
> still be a lousy tire, not remotely comparable to a quality tire
> with the
> same load rating.
>
> Choose wisely.
>
> See http://busdepot.com/details/tires.jsp for more on Vanagon tire
> safety.
>
>
> - Ron Salmon
>   The Bus Depot, Inc.
>   www.busdepot.com
>   (215)  234-VWVW
>
> _____________________________________________
> Toll-Free for Orders by PART # :  1-866-BUS-DEPOT

← Previous in thread
Back to July 2009, week 4
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »