← vanagon.com home · Continue the discussion in the forum
VanagonEuroVan
Sort by authorSort by posting dateSort by topicChronological orderMost recent firstShow authorHide authorShow table of contentsHide table of contentsBack to main VANAGON pageJoin or leave VANAGONSearch
Subject:Re: 1991 Vanagon 2.1L auto: failed DE emission test: CO (high)
From:OlRivrRat <OlRivrRat@COMCAST.NET>
Date:Wed, 31 May 2023 22:56:34 -0600

Karl

        Here’s My .5cent >

                General Rules of Emission Analysis

        • If CO goes up, O2 goes down, and conversely if O2 goes up, CO goes down. 
           Remember, CO readings are an indicator of a rich running engine 
           and O2 readings are an indicator of a lean running engine.

        • If HC increases as a result of a lean misfire, O2 will also increase

        • CO2 will decrease in any of the above cases because of an air/fuel imbalance or misfire

        • An increase in CO does not necessarily mean there will be an increase in HC. 
           Additional HC will only be created at the point where rich misfire begins (3% to 4% CO)

        • High HC, low CO, and high O2 at same time indicates a misfire due to lean or EGR diluted mixture

        • High HC, high CO, and high O2 at same time indicates a misfire due to excessively rich mixture.

        • High HC, Normal to marginally low CO, high O2, indicates a misfire due to a mechanical engine problem
           or ignition misfire

        • Normal to marginally high HC, Normal to marginally low CO, and high O2 indicates a misfire due to
           false air or marginally lean mixture

                From here

http://www.crypton.co.za/Tto%20know/Emissions/exhaust%20emissions.html

http://ricksfreeautorepairadvice.com/fix-high-hc-and-failed-emissions-test/

https://www.smogtips.com/failed-high-hydrocarbons-HC.cfm

http://www.auto-repair-help.com/auto_diagnostics/diagnose_emission_test_failure.php

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4st6Hf5-nJ4 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4st6Hf5-nJ4>

> On 31 May , 2023, at 5:38 PM, Karl Ploessl <karl.ploessl@GMAIL.COM> wrote:
> 
> I was driving about 10 miles to DMV and was waiting in line ~ 30 minutes
> with engine idling.
> -----
> 
> Karl '81 Westy "Jenny"
> 
> '91 Westy "Jenny 2" Wilmington, DE
> 
> On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 7:29 PM Eric Caron <ericcaron96@comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> Wow!
>> 
>> This will be an interesting conversation.
>> 
>> Only thing I’ve heard of is it helps to get tested when engine is well
>> heated up.  Also, basic tune up might help.  But, I look forward to better
>> thoughts.
>> 
>> Eric
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 31, 2023, at 5:41 PM, Karl Ploessl <karl.ploessl@GMAIL.COM>
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> here are the numbers:
>>> 
>>> low high
>>> 
>>> HC (ppm)
>>> 
>>> readings 145 88
>>> 
>>> limit 220 220
>>> 
>>> result PASS PASS
>>> 
>>> 
>>> CO (%)
>>> 
>>> readings 3.39 2.48
>>> 
>>> limit 1.20 1.20
>>> 
>>> result FAIL FAIL
>>> 
>>> 
>>> CO (%) + CO2 (%)
>>> 
>>> readings7.49 13.24
>>> 
>>> 
>>> RPM reading
>>> 
>>> readings 935 2580
>>> 
>>> limit 500 2200
>>> 
>>> result PASS PASS
>>> 
>>> 
>>> The alignments of the table is somewhat screwed up but it failed CO
>>> emission at low and at high RPMs (935 and 2580). What would be the
>> reason?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Karl '81 Westy "Jenny"
>>> 
>>> '91 Westy "Jenny 2" Wilmington, DE
>> 
>>

Next in thread →
Back to June 2023, week 1
Have something to add on this topic today? Revive this thread in the forum »